Worth passing on?
Select any line in the story to share just that line. Or keep it for later and find it under Saved.
Read the original at Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
Fetching the latest from every source…
MaxiStudio
Worth passing on?
Select any line in the story to share just that line. Or keep it for later and find it under Saved.
Read the original at Ars Technica
arstechnica.com
About this brief
This page is a restructured version of the publisher's story: the gist, extracted key points and cleaned body text. Approximately 173 words were processed.
One reason plastics are used so often is that they’re chemically inert, meaning bags, food containers, and cups don't react with what we put in them.

Key points
The story
One reason plastics are used so often is that they’re chemically inert, meaning bags, food containers, and cups don't react with what we put in them. Yet they can still break down into microplastics, which turn up in drinking water, human blood, arteries, and brains. The consequences of that are uncertain.
“Whether microplastics can directly cause human disease is still being researched,” said Wei Min, a chemist at Columbia University. In a new Nature study, Min's team took a step toward answering this question by demonstrating that microplastics are likely not as chemically inert as we might expect.
Microdroplet chemistry
Min's lab has spent years working on microdroplet chemistry, studying how water broken into tiny droplets behaves at its boundary with air. These droplets have been reported to generate reactive oxygen species, or ROS, a family of harmful, oxygen-containing molecules. “ROS will essentially bump into proteins, lipids, DNA, and cause damage,” Min said. “You could break a DNA strand into segments. You could mutate DNA; you could misfold proteins.” Read full article Comments

Under Health Secretary Robert F.

Up to a quarter of active-duty Army members could receive a low testosterone result from mandatory military screening, despite the true prevalence of the condition likely being a tiny fraction of that figure, according to a study published Thursday in JAMA.

The Liberty Bell, with its famous crack, hasn't been rung in 180 years, but that hasn't stopped scientists from pondering what the bell might have sounded like when tolling.